— Run your own numbers

Scale production. Not headcount.

Add your own parts and production data. See how a TAC compares to a manually operated print farm. From machine count and output to operator hours and production cost.

Same production target. Fewer machines. Less labor.

Printers & parts
21TAC-20
100

One row per printed part. Qty = how many go into one finished unit. Material sets a default €/kg spool price — edit it if you know your real cost.

25
Manual printer farm 21 printers
Parts per week 0
Operators needed 0 people
Operator hrs / week 0 hrs
Total cost / week €0
Cost per part Loading… €0
TAC20 automated 21 printers
Parts per week 0
Intervention time / week 0 hrs
Total cost / week €0
Cost per part Loading… €0

Low intervention time — limited to plate harvesting and material refills, no continuous operator presence required.

Fact

Matching this output manually (1 shift) would take 0 printers — reload/restart time included.

Weekly labor cost saved by automating €0 / year
€0

You've started building a real parts list. See the complete analysis — parts, cost per part and whether a TAC container makes sense for your production.

Illustrative estimate. The first two parts are open so you can see the model at work — add your own parts to see whether a TAC container is worth it for your product. Manual figures include a 20-minute changeover (bed harvest, reheat, restart) per print job; automated harvest is treated as immediate. Material prices are approximate per-kg defaults by material type. Figures are directional, not a quote; request a briefing for numbers specific to your configuration.